Improvements in diagnosis and risk assessment of primary and secondary antiphospholipid syndrome

11Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Classification criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome have not been updated since the revised Sapporo classification criteria were published in 2006. These criteria have limitations in that they omit nonclassical manifestations (hematologic and neurologic), include anticardiolipin and anti-β2-glycoprotein I immunoglobulin (Ig)M isotypes, and do not separately consider primary (no autoimmune disease) or secondary (usually systemic lupus erythematosus) disease. Recent findings in antiphospholipid antibody include fluctuation of antiphospholipid antibodies, recognition that IgA isotypes do confer risk, identification of the role of complementopathy in catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome, and elucidation of the role of thrombosis risk equations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Petri, M. (2019). Improvements in diagnosis and risk assessment of primary and secondary antiphospholipid syndrome. Hematology (United States), 2019(1), 415–420. https://doi.org/10.1182/hematology.2019000046

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free