Comparison of intermittent preventive treatment with chemoprophylaxis for the prevention of malaria during pregnancy in Mali

138Citations
Citations of this article
194Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background. Malaria during pregnancy contributes to maternal anemia and low birth weight. In East Africa, several studies have demonstrated that intermittent preventive treatment (IPT) with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) is more efficacious than weekly chloroquine (CQ) chemoprophylaxis in preventing these adverse consequences. To our knowledge, there are no published trials evaluating IPT in West Africa. Methods. We undertook a randomized controlled trial of weekly CQ chemoprophylaxis, 2-dose IPT with CQ, and 2-dose IPT with SP; 1163 women were enrolled. Results. In multivariate analyses, when compared with weekly CQ, IPT/SP was associated with a reduction in third-trimester anemia (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.49; P < .001), placental parasitemia (AOR, 0.69; P = .04), and low birth weight (<2500 g) (AOR, 0.69; P = .04). The prevalence of placental infection remained unexpectedly high, even in the IPT/SP group (24.5%), possibly because of the intensity of seasonal transmission. There were no significant differences in stillbirths, spontaneous abortions, or neonatal deaths among the 3 groups. Conclusions. In Mali, IPT with SP appears more efficacious than weekly chloroquine chemoprophylaxis in preventing malaria during pregnancy. These data support World Health Organization recommendations to administer at least 2 doses of IPT during pregnancy. In intensely seasonal transmission settings in Mali, >2 doses may be required to prevent placental reinfection prior to delivery.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kayentao, K., Kodio, M., Newman, R. D., Maiga, H., Doumtabe, D., Ongoiba, A., … Doumbo, O. (2005). Comparison of intermittent preventive treatment with chemoprophylaxis for the prevention of malaria during pregnancy in Mali. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 191(1), 109–116. https://doi.org/10.1086/426400

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free