The Ins and Outs of Conceptualizing Inclusion: Theoretical and Empirical Implications for the Study of Inclusive Approaches to Governance and Peace-building

1Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In the field of global security studies, inclusion, both in terms of process and outcomes, is certainly having a moment. Like many terms widely adopted by the international security and development communities, the utility of the discourse around inclusion stems in part from its ambiguity. The various contributions to this special issue make good and productive use of this ambiguity and have moved the discussion of inclusive approaches to governance, violence reduction, and peace-building forward. In doing so, however, they have put forth very different conceptualizations and operationalizations of inclusion and exclusion. Thus, my contribution to this symposium identifies these various conceptualizations, discusses the strengths and weaknesses of proposed measures, and concludes with remarks on the normative implications of these analyses.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hendrix, C. S. (2020). The Ins and Outs of Conceptualizing Inclusion: Theoretical and Empirical Implications for the Study of Inclusive Approaches to Governance and Peace-building. Journal of Global Security Studies, 5(1), 110–114. https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogz055

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free