Predictors of response and adherence to enuresis alarm therapy—a confirmatory study

6Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aim: To look for predictors to response and adherence to the enuresis alarm while exploring the possibility of families managing therapy independently. Methods: We used a body-worn alarm linked to a smartphone app. Subjects with enuresis were recruited both via paediatric nurses and independently as families bought the alarm and downloaded the app on their own. Results: We recruited 385 nurse-supported and 1125 independent subjects. Many (79.9%) dropped out before 8 weeks, but among adherent subjects 48.2% had a full or partial response. Age was a predictor of non-response (p = 0.019). Daytime incontinence did not influence response. If enuresis frequency did not decrease during the first 4 weeks of therapy the chance of response was very small (p < 0.001). Adherence was higher among subjects supported by a nurse (p < 0.001), but for adherent subjects the outcome was similar regardless of nurse support (p = 0.554). Conclusions: Daytime incontinence is no contraindication to enuresis alarm therapy. Treatment can be managed independently by the families, but adherence is enhanced by nurse support. Alarm treatment should be reassessed after 4 weeks. Enuresis alarm treatment guidelines need to be updated.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bergsten, A., Larsson, J., Borgström, M., Karanikas, B., & Nevéus, T. (2024). Predictors of response and adherence to enuresis alarm therapy—a confirmatory study. Acta Paediatrica, International Journal of Paediatrics, 113(3), 573–579. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.17039

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free