Fluid administration rate for uncontrolled intraabdominal hemorrhage in swine

8Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background We hypothesized that slow crystalloid resuscitation would result in less blood loss and a smaller hemoglobin decrease compared to a rapid resuscitation during uncontrolled hemorrhage. Methods Anesthetized, splenectomized domestic swine underwent hepatic lobar hemitransection. Lactated Ringers was given at 150 or 20 mL/min IV (rapid vs. slow, respectively, N = 12 per group; limit of 100 mL/kg). Primary endpoints were blood loss and serum hemoglobin; secondary endpoints included survival, vital signs, coagulation parameters, and blood gases. Results The slow group had a less blood loss (1.6 vs. 2.7 L, respectively) and a higher final hemoglobin concentration (6.0 vs. 3.4 g/dL). Conclusions Using a fixed volume of crystalloid resuscitation in this porcine model of uncontrolled intraabdominal hemorrhage, a slow IV infusion rate produced less blood loss and a smaller hemoglobin decrease compared to rapid infusion.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yanala, U. R., Johanning, J. M., Pipinos, I. I., High, R. R., Larsen, G., Velander, W. H., & Carlson, M. A. (2018). Fluid administration rate for uncontrolled intraabdominal hemorrhage in swine. PLoS ONE, 13(11). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207708

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free