Three-dimensional evaluation of long-term skeletal relapse following Le Fort I maxillary advancement surgery: a 2-year follow-up study

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess relapse following Le Fort I (LFI) maxillary advancement with superior or inferior repositioning at 2 years of follow-up. A total of 50 patients (26 female, 24 male; age range 15–56 years) with skeletal class II or III, who underwent bimaxillary surgery with LFI maxillary advancement in combination with either superior or inferior repositioning and also mandibular advancement/setback, were recruited. Preoperative (T0), immediate postoperative (T1), and 2-year postoperative (T2) cone beam computed tomography scans were acquired. Data were imported into a validated module to assess the skeletal movement (T0–T1) and relapse (T1–T2). Overall, the majority of the translational and rotational movements showed a relapse of <1 mm and <1°. Patients undergoing maxillary advancement with inferior repositioning in combination with mandibular advancement showed the highest amount of translational relapse in a superior (0.86 ± 0.85 mm, P < 0.0001) and posterior direction (−0.65 ± 1.11 mm, P < 0.0001). In relation to patients who received a bone graft, inferior repositioning with mandibular setback showed the highest maxillary relapse in a superior direction (1.20 ± 1.56 mm, P = 0.0719) with counterclockwise pitch rotation (2.15 ± 0.64°, P = 0.3759). Amongst the non-grafted procedures, superior repositioning with mandibular setback exhibited the highest relapse in a medial direction (1.38 ± 2.78 mm, P = 0.3981). Maxillary advancement was found to be a highly stable procedure with a lack of superoinferior stability in patients undergoing inferior repositioning.