Abstract
Objectives: to analyse the long-term results of primary composite bypass grafts comparing them to PTFE grafts. Design: a retrospective observational study. Materials and methods: between 1980 and 1996, 568 primary infrageniculate bypass procedures were performed; a saphenous-vein graft was used in 428 procedures, a PTFE graft in 44 and a composite PTFE-saphenous-vein graft in 96. Thirty-six composite graphs were below the knee and the remaining 60 extended more distally. Twenty-one bypass grafts from the latter group were sequential. Mean follow-up was 45.6 months. Five-year primary and secondary patency and limb salvage rates were compared by life-table analysis. Results: cumulative 5-year primary patency for composite grafts was 58% and for saphenous-vein grafts 74%, while secondary patency rate was 75% and 82%, respectively (p < 0.05). The 5-year limb salvage rate was 80% for composite grafts and 88% for saphenous-vein grafts (p > 0.05). The primary and secondary patency and limb salvage rate for PTFE grafts was 24%, 31% and 40%, respectively. Conclusion: Composite grafts of PTFE and saphenous vein are significantly superior to PTFE graft alone and should be used in patients who lack sufficient length of saphenous vein.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Bastounis, E., Georgopoulos, S., Maltezos, C., Alexiou, D., Chiotopoulos, D., & Bramis, J. (1999). PTFE-vein composite grafts for critical limb ischaemia: A valuable alternative to all-autogenous infrageniculate reconstructions. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 18(2), 127–132. https://doi.org/10.1053/ejvs.1999.0880
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.