Health services as credence goods: A field experiment

58Citations
Citations of this article
62Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Agency problems are a defining characteristic of healthcare markets. We present the results from a field experiment in the market for dental care: a test patient who does not need treatment is sent to 180 dentists to receive treatment recommendations. In the experiment, we vary the socio-economic status of the patient and whether a second opinion signal is sent. Furthermore, measures of market, practice and dentist characteristics are collected. We observe an overtreatment recommendation rate of 28% and a striking heterogeneity in treatment recommendations. Furthermore, we find significantly fewer overtreatment recommendations for patients with higher socio-economic status compared with lower socio-economic status for standard visits, suggesting a complex role for patients' socio-economic status. Competition intensity, measured by dentist density, does not have a significant influence on overtreatment. Dentists with shorter waiting times are more likely to propose unnecessary treatment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gottschalk, F., Mimra, W., & Waibel, C. (2021). Health services as credence goods: A field experiment. Economic Journal, 130(629), 1346–1383. https://doi.org/10.1093/EJ/UEAA024

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free