Comparison of CGRP and NO responses in the human peripheral microcirculation of migraine and control subjects

21Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and nitric oxide (NO) are two molecules shown to have a role in migraine pathophysiology. Our objective was to test the hypothesis that migraine subjects are particularly sensitive to these signal molecules. The cutaneous microvascular responses to endothelial and non-endothelial dependent dilators were tested using laser Doppler flowmetry in combination with iontophoresis. The blood flow responses to iontophoretic administration of the endothelium-dependent vasodilator acetylcholine (ACh), or to the endothelium-independent dilators sodium nitroprusside (SNP) and CGRP, and to local warming (44 °C) were compared in this controlled trial. The design was that of two arms: patients diagnosed with migraine without aura (n = 9) for >10 years were compared with nine healthy subjects matched for age and gender (seven female and two male, age range 30-60 years). Iontophoretic administration resulted in local vasodilation. ACh induced a relaxation of 1225 ± 245% (relative to baseline) in controls and 1468 ± 368% (P > 0.05) in migraine. The responses to SNP were 873 ± 193% in controls and 1080 ± 102% (P > 0.05) in migraine subjects. The responses to CGRP were 565 ± 89% in controls and 746 ± 675% (P > 0.05) in migraine patients. The responses to local heating which induced maximum dilation did not differ between the groups (1976 ± 314% for controls and 1432 ± 226% in migraine; P > 0.05. We conclude that there is no change in the microvascular responsiveness of the subcutaneous microvasculature in migraine. © Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2008.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Edvinsson, M. L., & Edvinsson, L. (2008). Comparison of CGRP and NO responses in the human peripheral microcirculation of migraine and control subjects. Cephalalgia, 28(5), 563–566. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2982.2008.01558.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free