Problematics of Direct Elections for Local Head after the Amendment of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia

  • Noor M
  • Kamarudin K
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The amendment of the 1945 Constitution sets that governors, regents, and local mayors are democratic in their election, originally selected by the legislative assembly and latterly sifted into direct election from the people. Based on the regulation No. 22 of 2007, it states that the election of local leader and co-leader is characterized as the part of general election regime, and thus it brings impact on local election, which should run directly as well. This article examines the arising problems on local election after the amendment of the 1945 Constitution, which reveals various problematic factors in the implementation of direct election for local head has been officially established. Indonesia has run local election many times in different eras, including in Dutch colonialism, Japan colonialism, and post-independence era. In post-independence era, Indonesia also has various political climates and traditions and including Old Order, New Order, and reformation era. The alteration of this general election system aims to provide fair democracy for all people to vote for their local leaders. The implementation, however, encounters several factors and problems derived from the level of participation up to the readiness of local election committee.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Noor, M. T., & Kamarudin, K. (2017). Problematics of Direct Elections for Local Head after the Amendment of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Asian Social Science, 13(7), 158. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v13n7p158

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free