Feasibility of serum pentosidine level as a potential risk factor for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture

14Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Study Design: Feasibility study. Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility of using serum pentosidine level as a potential marker for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF). Overview of Literature: A review of previous studies suggests a negative correlation between serum pentosidine concentration and bone strength. However, it is unclear whether serum pentosidine level might be a potential marker of OVCF in Koreans. Methods: Forty patients who underwent bone mineral density examination were included in this study, and their serum pentosidine levels were prospectively analyzed. Serum pentosidine level was evaluated using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Among all the patients, 11 with OVCF were assigned to the vertebral fracture group and 29 who did not have vertebral fracture were included in the non-fracture group. In addition, we used the Fracture Risk Assessment (FRAX) tool Korean version for assessing the 10-year probability of fracture. Results: There was a statistically significant difference in the mean serum pentosidine level (p =0.04) of the vertebral fracture group (110.8 ng/mL) and the non-fracture group (64.3 ng/mL). Logistic regression analyses showed that serum pentosidine was significantly associated with OVCF. The vertebral fracture group had significantly higher 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fracture as per FRAX than the non-fracture group. There was a positive correlation between pentosidine level and FRAX results (r =0.35, p =0.02). Conclusions: These results suggest that increased serum pentosidine level could be a potential marker for OVCF.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Choi, D. H., Lee, S. M., Lim, S. A., & Choi, Y. S. (2018). Feasibility of serum pentosidine level as a potential risk factor for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture. Asian Spine Journal, 12(6), 992–997. https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2018.12.6.992

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free