The Prep statistic as a measure of confidence in model fitting

12Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In traditional statistical methodology (e.g., the ANOVA), confidence in the observed results is often assessed by computing the p value or the power of the test. In most cases, adding more participants to a study will improve these measures more than will increasing the amount of data collected from each participant. Thus, traditional statistical methods are biased in favor of experiments with large numbers of participants. This article proposes a method for computing confidence in the results of experiments in which data are collected from a few participants over many trials. In such experiments, it is common to fit a series of mathematical models to the resulting data and to conclude that the best-fitting model is superior. The probability of replicating this result (i.e., Prep) is derived for any two nested models. Simulations and empirical applications of this new statistic confirm its utility in studies in which data are collected from a few participants over many trials. Copyright 2008 Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ashby, F. G., & O’Brien, J. B. (2008). The Prep statistic as a measure of confidence in model fitting. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15(1), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.1.16

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free