Real-world switch patterns and healthcare costs in biologic-naive psoriasis patients initiating apremilast or biologics

10Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aim: Treatment switching and healthcare costs were compared among biologic-naive psoriasis patients initiating apremilast or biologics with ≥12 months pre-/post-index continuous enrollment in Optum Clinformatics™ Data Mart. Methods: After propensity score matching, switch rates (new therapy post-index) and days between index and switch were assessed. Total and per-patient per-month costs by service type were assessed. Results: Apremilast initiators (n = 533) were matched and compared with biologic initiators (n = 955). Twelve-month cumulative switch rates and days to switch were similar. Apremilast initiators had significantly lower total healthcare costs than biologic initiators; apremilast switchers and nonswitchers had significantly lower per-patient per-month costs than biologic switchers and nonswitchers, driven mainly by reduced outpatient pharmacy costs. Conclusion: Apremilast initiators had lower healthcare costs even with treatment switching.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wu, J. J., Pelletier, C., Ung, B., Tian, M., Khilfeh, I., & Curtis, J. R. (2020). Real-world switch patterns and healthcare costs in biologic-naive psoriasis patients initiating apremilast or biologics. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research, 9(11), 767–779. https://doi.org/10.2217/cer-2020-0045

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free