Priority stratification for colonoscopy based on two-sample faecal immunochemical test screening: Results from a cross-sectional study at an endoscopy clinic in Japan

8Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives Little has been reported on the yield and characteristics of colorectal neoplasia detected by the two-sample faecal immunochemical test (FIT), particularly the difference between subjects with two-positive results on the two-sample FIT and those with one-positive results. We aimed to assess risk stratification among patients with positive two-sample FIT to prioritise colonoscopy. Design A retrospective cross-sectional study. Setting A single-centre, representative endoscopy clinic in Japan. Participants Consecutive patients who underwent colonoscopy were enrolled. Indications for colonoscopy included two-positive results on the two-sample FIT (FIT (+/+)), one-positive results on the two-sample FIT (FIT (+/-)), and other reasons (non-FIT group, including presence of symptoms, screening or surveillance). Primary and secondary outcome measures Primary outcomes were detection rates of colorectal cancers, including in situ (all cancers) and invasive cancers, based on the indications for colonoscopy. Secondary outcomes were cancer features, such as location, size, T stage and histological subtype. Results Of the 8724 patients, 264 underwent colonoscopy following FIT (+/+), 1018 following FIT (+/-) and 7442 for reasons other than positive FIT. Detection rates of all (and invasive) cancers in the FIT (+/+), FIT (+/-) and non-FIT groups were 12.1% (8.3%), 1.9% (0.3%) and 0.4% (0.2%), respectively. The cancer detection rates were much higher in the FIT (+/+) group than in the FIT (+/-) group, which in turn had higher rates than the non-FIT group. Moreover, the FIT (+/+) group showed more advanced T stages on tumour, node, metastasis (TNM) classification (Tis/T1/T2/T3/T4: 10/7/4/10/1) than the FIT (+/-) group (16/1/2/0/0, p<0.001). Conclusions Two-positive results for two-sample FIT showed a much higher yield for more advanced colorectal cancers than the one-positive result. High priority for diagnostic colonoscopy should be assigned to patients with two-positive-FIT results.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Toyoshima, O., Yamaji, Y., Nishizawa, T., Yoshida, S., Yamada, T., Kurokawa, K., … Koike, K. (2021). Priority stratification for colonoscopy based on two-sample faecal immunochemical test screening: Results from a cross-sectional study at an endoscopy clinic in Japan. BMJ Open, 11(5). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046055

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free