Comparing the association between insurance and mortality in ovarian, Pancreatic, Lung, Colorectal, Prostate, and breast cancers

26Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Insurance coverage is associated with better cancer outcomes; however, the relative importance of insurance coverage may differ between cancers. This study compared the association between insurance coverage at diagnosis and cancer-specific mortality (CSM; insurance sensitivity) in 6 cancers. Patients and Methods: Using the SEER cancer registry, data were abstracted for individuals diagnosed with ovarian, pancreatic, lung, colorectal, prostate, or breast cancer in 2007 through 2010. The association between insurance coverage at diagnosis and CSM was modeled using a Fine and Gray competingrisks regression adjusted for demographics. An interaction term combining insurance status and cancer type was used to test whether insurance sensitivity differed between cancers. Separatemodels were fit for each cancer. To control for lead-time bias and to assess whether insurance sensitivity may be mediated by earlier diagnosis and treatment, additional models were fit adjusting for disease stage and treatment. Results: Lack of insurance was associated with an increased hazard of CSM in all cancers (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cole, A. P., Lu, C., Krimphove, M. J., Szymaniak, J., Sun, M., Fletcher, S. A., … Trinh, Q. D. (2019). Comparing the association between insurance and mortality in ovarian, Pancreatic, Lung, Colorectal, Prostate, and breast cancers. JNCCN Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 17(9), 1049–1058. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2019.7296

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free