Displacement beyond dislocation: Aversive racism in gentrification studies

  • Bloch S
  • Meyer D
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this article, we argue for a critical gentrification studies that includes a more expansive and nuanced understanding of how displacement works, beyond the mapping and counting of dislocated bodies. As part of our argument, we introduce the concept of aversive racism to the geographical literature on displacement, pointing to this insidious mode of spatial practice that we argue is widely constitutive of place-making and place-taking processes in gentrifying areas. We do this by first providing a review and analysis of how displacement has been conceptualized and measured in existing geographical scholarship on gentrification, followed by a critical examination of the gentrification literature's engagement with race and racism, and a final argument for an affective approach within a Black geographies framing that encourages more analyses based on experiential encounters with more-than-physical displacement-by-gentrification.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bloch, S., & Meyer, D. (2023). Displacement beyond dislocation: Aversive racism in gentrification studies. Dialogues in Urban Research, 1(3), 206–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/27541258231179188

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free