Comparison of MDCT radiation dose: a phantom study.

27Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Recently there has been a significant increase in the use of CT imaging resulting in a significant increase in radiation exposure to the population. Few studies have compared the degree of radiation exposure among the currently available MDCT units. Our objective is to make such a comparison. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a Rando anthropomorphic phantom, we placed thermoluminescent dosimeters into the center, anterior, and lateral aspect of the lower chest of the phantom. Standard CT of the chest was performed with the current protocols used at our institution on 4-, 8-, and 16-MDCT GE Healthcare systems. Next, near-identical CT scans of the entire chest were performed on the same CT systems. RESULTS: The 4-detector array showed statistically significantly higher radiation dose compared with the 16-detector array with near-identical technique (p < 0.01). There is a trend toward decreasing radiation dose with the increasing number of detectors using both standard and near-identical technique. An inverse relationship exists between measured radiation dose and the number of detectors. CONCLUSION: We theorize that as the number of detectors increases, there is a decrease in the amount of nonutilized radiation exposure, thus resulting in a lower total radiation dose.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Moore, W. H., Bonvento, M., & Olivieri-Fitt, R. (2006). Comparison of MDCT radiation dose: a phantom study. AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology, 187(5). https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.05.1491

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free