Cost and benefits of processivity in enzymatic degradation of recalcitrant polysaccharides

241Citations
Citations of this article
197Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Many enzymes that hydrolyze insoluble crystalline polysaccharides such as cellulose and chitin guide detached single-polymer chains through long and deep active-site clefts, leading to processive (stepwise) degradation of the polysaccharide. We have studied the links between enzyme efficiency and processivity by analyzing the effects of mutating aromatic residues in the substrate-binding groove of a processive chitobiohydrolase, chitinase B from Serratia marcescens. Mutation of two tryptophan residues (Trp-97 and Trp-220) close to the catalytic center (subsites +1 and +2) led to reduced processivity and a reduced ability to degrade crystalline chitin, suggesting that these two properties are linked. Most remarkably, the loss of processivity in the W97A mutant was accompanied by a 29-fold increase in the degradation rate for single-polymer chains as present in the soluble chitin-derivative chitosan. The properties of the W220A mutant showed a similar trend, although mutational effects were less dramatic. Processivity is thought to contribute to the degradation of crystalline polysaccharides because detached single-polymer chains are kept from reassociating with the solid material. The present results show that this processivity comes at a large cost in terms of enzyme speed. Thus, in some cases, it might be better to focus strategies for enzymatic depolymerization of polysaccharide biomass on improving substrate accessibility for nonprocessive enzymes rather than on improving the properties of processive enzymes. © 2006 by The National Academy of Sciences of the USA.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Horn, S. J., Sikorski, P., Cederkvist, J. B., Vaaje-Kolstad, G., Sørlie, M., Synstad, B., … Eijsink, V. G. H. (2006). Cost and benefits of processivity in enzymatic degradation of recalcitrant polysaccharides. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103(48), 18089–18094. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0608909103

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free