Procedural economy at the international court of justice

5Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In April 2016, the International Court of Justice held a colloquium to commemorate the 70th anniversary of its establishment. One of the principal themes of this event was the potential adoption of improvements to the procedures and working practices of the Court. Responses to a Counsel Survey revealed a general interest in procedural reform at the Court, particularly with respect to the areas of evidence and procedural efficiency. The purpose of this article is to set out a case for procedural reform at the ICJ, presenting multiple options, with supplementary reference to the ITLOS. Whereas the work of the Committee also addresses procedural integrity or “the sound administration of justice”, this contribution will focus upon the Court’s case management procedures to call for their reform in order to enhance procedural economy. This would enable the Court to improve its “throughput” to be able to cope with an expanded caseload.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sarvarian, A. (2019). Procedural economy at the international court of justice. Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals, 18(1), 74–100. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718034-12341396

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free