The Philosophical Underpinnings of Social Constructionist Discourse Analysis

  • Gralewski M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Although discourse analysis emerges as a multi-faceted research method reflecting various schools of thought, disciplines and aplcts issues or fundamental assumptions common for most of them. This article aims to investigate different philosophical aspeand theoproaches, it is possible to pinpoint some meta-theoretical issues or fundamental assumptions common for most of them. This article aims to investigate different philosophical aspects and theoretical foundations that inform discourse analysis, such as the interplay between epistemological and ontological dimensions or the definition of language itself. Because space does not allow an in-depth discussion of all the theoretical orientations collectively contributing to the development of social constructionist discourse analysis, this paper focuses on poststructuralist, constructivist, and social realist positions, and also attempts to trace the roots of social constructionism in linguistic philosophy, phenomenology, and hermeneutics. Hopefully, this article will provide the opportunity to develop meta-theoretical reflections on discourse analysis, thus striking the balance between the philosophy, methodology and practice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gralewski, M. (2011). The Philosophical Underpinnings of Social Constructionist Discourse Analysis. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.2478/v10016-011-0007-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free