Abstract
As Industry 4.0 will greatly challenge employee mental workload (MWL), research on objective wearable MWL-monitoring is in high demand. However, numerous research lines validating such technology might become redundant when employees eventually object to its implementation. In a pilot study, we manipulated two ways in which employees might perceive MWL-monitoring initiatives. We found that framing the technology in terms of serving intrinsic goals (e.g., improving health) together with an autonomy-supportive context (e.g., allowing discussion) yields higher user acceptability when compared to framing in terms of extrinsic goals (e.g., increasing productivity) together with a controlling context (e.g., mandating use). User acceptability still panned out neutral in case of the former, however - feeding into our own and suggested future work.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
van Acker, B. B., Conradie, P., Vlerick, P., & Saldien, J. (2019). Employee acceptability of wearable mental workload monitoring in industry 4.0: A pilot study on motivational and contextual framing. In Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design (Vol. 2019-August, pp. 2101–2109). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.216
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.