Employee acceptability of wearable mental workload monitoring in industry 4.0: A pilot study on motivational and contextual framing

8Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

As Industry 4.0 will greatly challenge employee mental workload (MWL), research on objective wearable MWL-monitoring is in high demand. However, numerous research lines validating such technology might become redundant when employees eventually object to its implementation. In a pilot study, we manipulated two ways in which employees might perceive MWL-monitoring initiatives. We found that framing the technology in terms of serving intrinsic goals (e.g., improving health) together with an autonomy-supportive context (e.g., allowing discussion) yields higher user acceptability when compared to framing in terms of extrinsic goals (e.g., increasing productivity) together with a controlling context (e.g., mandating use). User acceptability still panned out neutral in case of the former, however - feeding into our own and suggested future work.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

van Acker, B. B., Conradie, P., Vlerick, P., & Saldien, J. (2019). Employee acceptability of wearable mental workload monitoring in industry 4.0: A pilot study on motivational and contextual framing. In Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design (Vol. 2019-August, pp. 2101–2109). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.216

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free