Meta-Analysis of Counseling Outcomes for the Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

16Citations
Citations of this article
150Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This meta-analysis of 152 published posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) clinical trials from 1990 to 2012 concluded that counseling generally produced a small to large effect of treatment across all comparison conditions at termination (d+ = 0.30 to 0.89). These gains were maintained at longest follow-up (d+ = 0.58 to 0.86) for the wait-list, treatment-as-usual, and single-group comparisons, but not for the follow-up placebo comparison (d+ = 0.15), probably because of the low power (j = 3 placebo studies). Clinical trial findings were synthesized using a random-effects model. No effects of publication bias or moderating variables were evident. No difference was found between trauma-focused and non-trauma-focused approaches. Implications for counseling practice and future PTSD outcome research are addressed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Erford, B. T., Gunther, C., Duncan, K., Bardhoshi, G., Dummett, B., Kraft, J., … Ross, M. (2016). Meta-Analysis of Counseling Outcomes for the Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder. Journal of Counseling and Development, 94(1), 13–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcad.12058

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free