The effects of various final irrigants on the bond strength of root dentin exposed to chloroform: An in vitro study

0Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Aim: The aim of the study was to assess the reaction of different final irrigants to the bond strength of root dentin exposed to chloroform. Materials and Methods: Fifty extracted maxillary central incisors were selected. Working length was determined, and canal was instrumented with ProTaper rotary system (Dentsply Maillefer) till F4 file. The specimens were then divided into five groups (n = 10). Group 1: not disclosed to any root canal solvent, Group 2: disclosed to chloroform for 5 min, Group 3: chloroform for 5 min followed by absolute alcohol, Group 4: chloroform for 5 min followed by chlorhexidine (CHX), And Group 5 - chloroform for 5 min followed by saline. The canals were obturated with F4 gutta-percha cones with AH Plus sealer. The samples will be sectioned horizontally into 1 ± 0.1 mm thick slices. The push-out bond strength was performed in a universal testing machine. Results were statistically analyzed by one-way analysis of variance. Results: There existed a significant difference between the mean push-out bond strength of different groups. Irrigation with chloroform negatively affected the bonding between root canal sealer and root dentine. Absolute alcohol significantly improved the bond strength values. Conclusion: Exposure with chloroform during the retreatment will decrease the bonding between sealer (AH Plus) and root dentine. The use of absolute alcohol as a final irrigant improved the bonding between sealer and dentin. CHX and saline showed no improvement in bond strength.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kuriakose, F., Joy, B., Mathew, J., Karathodiyil, R., Hariprasad, R., & Philip, T. (2021). The effects of various final irrigants on the bond strength of root dentin exposed to chloroform: An in vitro study. Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences, 13(5), S629–S632. https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_555_20

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free