Magnetic resonance imaging for fistulography in perianal fistula: clinicoradiological correlation

  • Sarda H
  • Pandey A
  • Regmi S
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: This article aims to review the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) fistulography in evaluation of perianal fistula along with its concordance with clinical examination and impact on surgical intervention.Methods: A retrospective study of 61 patients who underwent surgery for anal fistula in RMLIMS collected from database from January 1, 2017 to September, 2021Results: The study showed a significant MRI contribution to clinical evaluation in 65.6%. MRI provided significant information for complex fistu­las than for simple fistulas (45% vs. 14.6%, p=0.01). Proportion of patients with sig­nificant MRI contribution increased with in­creasing Parks grade (grade 1, 8.3%; grade 2, 52.2%, p=0.001). The concordance between St. James Hos­pital grade and Parks classification was 0.768 (Kappa coefficient, p<0.00).Conclusions: Therefore, we propose inclusion of MRI in the preoperative surgical assessment of anal fistulas when recurrent, complex, high grade, or when the external opening is located more than 2 cm from the anal canal.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sarda, H., Pandey, A., Regmi, S., & Masood, S. (2022). Magnetic resonance imaging for fistulography in perianal fistula: clinicoradiological correlation. International Surgery Journal, 9(9), 1553. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20222094

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free