Amplatzer amulet versus watchman device for percutaneous left atrial appendage closure: A systematic review and meta-analysis

8Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: The Amplatzer Amulet (AA) and Watchman devices (WD) are the 2 most frequently used devices for percutaneous LAA closure globally. Objective: To evaluate the safety and clinical outcomes associated with these 2 devices in patients undergoing percutaneous LAA closure. Method: We systematically searched all electronic databases from inception until February 21, 2023. The primary endpoint was procedure related complications. Secondary endpoints were device related thrombus, stroke, cardiovascular mortality, peri device leak, systemic embolism, and all-cause mortality. Results: A total of 3 randomized clinical trials with 2150 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The mean age was 75 and 76 years in the Amplatzer group and in the Watchman group, respectively. The odds of procedure-related complications (OR, 1.80 [95% CI: 1.21-2.67], P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jaiswal, V., Ang, S. P., Shrestha, A. B., Wajid, Z., Endurance, E. O., Ayoobkhan, F. S., … Biswas, M. (2023). Amplatzer amulet versus watchman device for percutaneous left atrial appendage closure: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (United States), 102(26), E34185. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000034185

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free