Abstract
Background: The Amplatzer Amulet (AA) and Watchman devices (WD) are the 2 most frequently used devices for percutaneous LAA closure globally. Objective: To evaluate the safety and clinical outcomes associated with these 2 devices in patients undergoing percutaneous LAA closure. Method: We systematically searched all electronic databases from inception until February 21, 2023. The primary endpoint was procedure related complications. Secondary endpoints were device related thrombus, stroke, cardiovascular mortality, peri device leak, systemic embolism, and all-cause mortality. Results: A total of 3 randomized clinical trials with 2150 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The mean age was 75 and 76 years in the Amplatzer group and in the Watchman group, respectively. The odds of procedure-related complications (OR, 1.80 [95% CI: 1.21-2.67], P
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Jaiswal, V., Ang, S. P., Shrestha, A. B., Wajid, Z., Endurance, E. O., Ayoobkhan, F. S., … Biswas, M. (2023). Amplatzer amulet versus watchman device for percutaneous left atrial appendage closure: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (United States), 102(26), E34185. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000034185
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.