Human- or object-like? Cognitive anthropomorphism of humanoid robots

28Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Across three experiments (N = 302), we explored whether people cognitively elaborate humanoid robots as human- or object-like. In doing so, we relied on the inversion paradigm, which is an experimental procedure extensively used by cognitive research to investigate the elaboration of social (vs. non-social) stimuli. Overall, mixed-model analyses revealed that full-bodies of humanoid robots were subjected to the inversion effect (body-inversion effect) and, thus, followed a configural processing similar to that activated for human beings. Such a pattern of finding emerged regardless of the similarity of the considered humanoid robots to human beings. That is, it occurred when considering bodies of humanoid robots with medium (Experiment 1), high and low (Experiment 2) levels of human likeness. Instead, Experiment 3 revealed that only faces of humanoid robots with high (vs. low) levels of human likeness were subjected to the inversion effects and, thus, cognitively anthropomorphized. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings for robotic and psychological research are discussed. Copyright:

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sacino, A., Cocchella, F., De Vita, G., Bracco, F., Rea, F., Sciutti, A., & Andrighetto, L. (2022). Human- or object-like? Cognitive anthropomorphism of humanoid robots. PLoS ONE, 17(7 July). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270787

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free