Effect of Fe addition on properties of Ti–6Al-xFe manufactured by blended elemental process

35Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The mechanical properties of titanium alloys produced by powder metallurgy (PM) are dependent on the amount of porosity within the fabricated component. The space between powder particles and the behaviour of alloying elements during sintering contribute to the formation of pores. Iron (Fe) is well known to be a cost-effective alloying element for titanium alloys which acts to stabilise the β-phase. This study aims to investigate the effects of Fe addition on the sintering response of titanium alloys containing aluminium. Ti–6Al-xFe(x = 1, 3, and 5 wt %) alloy systems were manufactured by press and sinter PM from blended-elemental powders. The density, mechanical properties, microstructures and pore distribution in the sintered parts were evaluated. The compressive strength of the alloys was positively correlated to the levels of Fe. Grain boundary and solid solution strengthening accounted for the strength improvements. Furthermore, Ti–6Al–3Fe exhibited the highest strength/modulus ratio. Evaluation of the pore distributions revealed that the number of fine pores was reduced significantly as the amount of Fe was increased, though concomitantly the number of larger pores increased. It is argued that the increasing number of larger pores with higher levels of Fe is due to coalescence of fine Kirkendall porosity during the latter stages of sintering. With excessive iron additions, large pores counteract any beneficial impacts on the sintering response. It is suggested to limit the amount of Fe additions to around 3 wt% to reduce adverse effects from large pores and to maximise the strength/modulus ratio.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sjafrizal, T., Dehghan-Manshadi, A., Kent, D., Yan, M., & Dargusch, M. S. (2020). Effect of Fe addition on properties of Ti–6Al-xFe manufactured by blended elemental process. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103518

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free