Non-invasive central venous pressure measurement using enclosed-zone central venous pressure (ezCVPTM)

2Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Central venous pressure (CVP) is measured to assess intravascular fluid status. Although the clinical gold standard for evaluating CVP is invasive measurement using catheterization, the use of catheterization is limited in a clinical setting because of its invasiveness. We developed novel non-invasive technique, enclosed-zone (ezCVPTM) measurement for estimating CVP. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of ezCVP and the relationship between ezCVP and CVP measured by a catheter. Methods and Results: We conducted 291 measurements in 97 patients. Linear regression analysis revealed that ezCVP was significantly correlated with CVP (r=0.65, P<0.0001). The Bland-Altman analysis showed that ezCVP had an underestimation bias of −2.5mmHg with 95% limits of agreement of −14.1mmHg and 9.6mmHg for CVP (P<0.0001). The areas under the curves of receiver operating curve with ezCVP to detect the CVP ≥12cmH2O (8.8mmHg) and CVP >10mmHg were 0.81 or 0.88, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and positive likelihood ratio of ezCVP for the CVP ≥8.8mmHg and CVP >10mmHg were 0.59, 0.96 and 14.8 with a cut-off value of 11.9 and 0.79, 0.97 and 26.3 with a cut-off value of 12.7. Conclusions: These findings suggest that ezCVP measurement is feasible and useful for assessing CVP.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hidaka, T., Sumimoto, Y., Dohi, Y., Morimoto, H., Susawa, H., Nitta, K., … Higashi, Y. (2020). Non-invasive central venous pressure measurement using enclosed-zone central venous pressure (ezCVPTM). Circulation Journal, 84(7), 1112–1117. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-20-0129

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free