Value of transvaginal ultrasonography versus Bishop Score in predicting successful induction of labor

  • Eid M
  • Abdallah A
  • ElHalwagy A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Induction of labor is a widely used intervention in modern labor. Bishop score, the gold standard for assessing favourability for induction of labor is very subjective with a poor predictive value.Objective: To compare the transvaginal ultrasonography and the score proposed by Kepansereel in prediction of success of labor induction.Patients and Methods: A prospective study involved 50 women subjected to induction of labor. Preinduction assessment of Bishop score and ultrasound measurement of cervical length, posterior cervical angle and cervical funnelling was done.Results: 35 and 15 cases had successful and unsuccessful induction .Cervical length was significantly longer and posterior cervical angle was significantly larger in cases of failed induction (p < 0.001 for both). The Bishop score and Keepanasseril core were significantly lower in association with induction failure (p < 0.001 for both).Conclusion: Successful induction correlated significantly with the Bishop score and ultrasonographic cervical length and posterior cervical angle.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Eid, M., Abdallah, A., & ElHalwagy, A. (2017). Value of transvaginal ultrasonography versus Bishop Score in predicting successful induction of labor. Evidence Based Women’s Health Journal, 0(0), 125–130. https://doi.org/10.21608/ebwhj.2017.5576

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free