Abstract
Imine-linked covalent organic frameworks (COFs) have attracted considerable interest in recent years because they can form strong and reversible covalent bonds, enabling the development of highly ordered crystalline structures. This reversibility is crucial in correcting structural defects during the crystallization process, which requires sufficient time to proceed. This review critically examines the advancements in synthetic strategies for these valuable materials, focusing on catalytic versus conventional approaches. Traditional methods for synthesizing imine-linked COFs often involve harsh reaction conditions and prolonged reaction times, which can limit the scalability and environmental sustainability of these frameworks. In contrast, catalytic approaches offer more efficient pathways, enabling shorter reaction times, milder reaction conditions, and higher yields. This article elucidates the key differences between these methodologies and examines the impact of reduced reaction times and milder conditions on the crystallinity and porosity of COFs. By comparing the catalytic and conventional synthesis routes, this review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the advantages and limitations of each approach, offering insights into the optimal strategies for the development of high-performance COFs.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Jafari, M., Peng, Z., Samie, A., Taghavi, F., Khojastehnezhad, A., & Siaj, M. (2025, July 1). Catalyst-Driven Improvements in Conventional Methods for Imine-Linked Covalent Organic Frameworks. Molecules. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30142969
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.