Abstract
Background/Objectives: Clinical instruction and mentorship are essential components of nursing education and early professional development. In Greece, while nursing curricula align with EU directives mandating both theoretical and clinical training, significant gaps persist in the quality, coordination, and legislative support of mentorship. This work aims to (i) synthesise evidence on clinical instruction and mentorship in Greece and draw on selected European examples to provide contextual insight, and (ii) integrate national stakeholder perspectives to generate actionable recommendations for a Greek clinical mentorship framework. Methods: A narrative literature review was conducted, identifying 19 eligible articles examining mentorship, clinical instruction and preceptorship in European and Greek contexts. In addition, a national stakeholder focus group with 25 participants, including representatives from academia, healthcare institutions, regulatory bodies, and nursing associations, was held in Athens in 2024. Data from both sources were thematically analysed and integrated to identify gaps, best practices, and context-specific recommendations. Results: Findings revealed inconsistent collaboration between universities and clinical institutions, limited training and recognition for clinical instructors, and the absence of a unified national framework. Stakeholders highlighted structural barriers to clinical mentoring such as understaffing and lack of policy support and expressed strong interest in a mentorship reform. Comparative analysis with European models demonstrated feasible pathways for Greece, including structured training, certification, and non-financial incentives. During the national stakeholder focus group, a dual-pathway mentorship system tailored for nursing students and newly hired nurses was most recommended to ensure both continuity and quality in professional development of nurses. Conclusions: Despite alignment with EU directives, Greece lacks an integrated national mentorship framework that ensures consistent clinical learning and supports workforce development. Two priority policy actions emerge from this work: (1) establishing a legally supported national certification and training system for clinical mentorship, and (2) educational structures in the clinical setting to improve educational quality, workforce retention and patient care outcomes.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Praxmarer-Fernandes, S., Roditi, E., Katsoulas, T., Skela-Savič, B., Langins, M., Triantafyllou, C., & Breda, J. (2025). Strengthening Student Nurses’ Clinical Learning in Greece Through Mentorship: Findings from a Narrative Review and a National Stakeholder Focus Group. Nursing Reports, 15(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15120445
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.