Surgical outcomes of idiopathic epiretinal membrane: The Gülhane experience

4Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: We aimed to report our experiences and outcomes of vitreoretinal surgery in idiopathic epiretinal membrane. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent vitreoretinal surgery for idiopathic epiretinal membrane between January 2012 and 2014. The patients’ pre- and postoperative visual acuity, slit-lamp examination findings, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) images were evaluated. Results: Forty-five eyes of 45 patients (36% male, 64% female) were included (mean age, 69±8.2 years). Mean postoperative follow-up time was 7±4 (1-12) months. The mean preoperative logMAR best corrected visual acuity was 0.58±0.32 and postoperatively 0.40±0.31, 0.33±0.33, 0.28±0.34 respectively at 3, 6, and 12 months. All OCT parameters showed statistically significant anatomical improvement at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Correlation analysis showed that central macular thickness (r=0.69, p<0.05) and central macular volume (r=0.69, p<0.05) were the only parameters that had strong positive correlations with visual improvement. Conclusion: Epiretinal membrane causes heterogeneous anatomical changes in the macula for every patient. Therefore, a correlation between visual gain and changes in central macular thickness could not yet be demonstrated. We believe that central macular volume may be a better parameter for following these patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Akıncıoğlu, D., Özge, G., Küçükevcilioğlu, M., Erdurman, F. C., & Durukan, A. H. (2018). Surgical outcomes of idiopathic epiretinal membrane: The Gülhane experience. Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology, 48(2), 75–80. https://doi.org/10.4274/tjo.00334

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free