First Canadian experience with same-day discharge after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

7Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of implementing a same-day discharge (SDD) protocol for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and pelvic lymph node dissection. Methods: We performed a prospective cohort study including all consecutive eligible patients undergoing RARP in 2021 following initiation of SDD RARP protocol in April. Baseline characteristics were compared using t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and odds ratios (OR) calculated using multiple logistic regression to assess for predictors of SDD success. Results: A total of 117 patients underwent RARP in 2021 following initiation of the SDD protocol. Fifty-seven patients were initiated on the SDD pathway, and 60 patients underwent surgery as an inpatient (IP-RARP). Of those on the SDD pathway (SDD-RARP), 33 (58%) were successfully discharged the same day of surgery, while 24 (42%) failed SDD. Baseline demographics were well-balanced between cohorts. Case order, increased patient age, and distance travelled to the hospital were factors associated with selection of patients for the IP-RARP protocol. In total, 12 SDD and 12 IP patients presented to the emergency department (p=1.0), and none within 24 hours of discharge. There were no hospital admissions in the SDD cohort, with four readmissions in the IP cohort (p=0.1). Multiple logistic regression revealed that case order (second case) was the only predictive factor for SDD success (OR 4.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.59–11.62, p=0.005). Conclusions: Implementation of an SDD pathway following RARP is feasible, with no increase in rates of complications, unscheduled visits, or readmissions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Millan, B., Cassim, R., Uy, M., Bay, B., & Shayegan, B. (2023). First Canadian experience with same-day discharge after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Canadian Urological Association Journal, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.7914

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free