Comparison of in vitro metabolic conversion of capecitabine to 5-FU in rats, mice, monkeys and humans - toxicological implications

23Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Capecitabine is an oral anticancer prodrug which is converted to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) via 3 enzymatic steps, these being 5'-deoxy-5-fluorocytidine (5'-DFCR), 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine (5'-DFUR), and finally 5-FU by carboxylesterase (CES), cytidine deaminase (CDA), and thymidine phosphorylase (TP), respectively. Because rats, mice and monkeys are used for preclinical safety studies, we investigated the in vitro conversion from capecitabine to 5-FU by hepatic and intestinal mucosal microsomes and cytosols, to compare their metabolic activity to that of humans. Capecitabine was hydrolyzed to 5'-DFCR in hepatic and intestinal mucosal microsomes in these animal species. In humans and monkeys, CLint (Vmax/Km) for the hydrolysis of capecitabine in intestine (expressed as μl/min/g tissue) was much lower than that in hepatic microsomes but, in rats and mice, CLint was higher in intestine than in liver. In humans and monkeys, similar Km values and inhibition patterns by tetrahydrouridine (THU) a CDA inhibitor, were observed in CDA activity of hepatic and intestinal cytosols. However, rats showed very low CDA activity and mice showed non-Michaelis-Menten kinetics and a different inhibition pattern by THU. Km values for TP activity were almost similar in rats, mice, monkeys and humans. In conclusion, it was confirmed that monkeys are a suitable animal model for the safety assessment of capecitabine in terms of metabolic enzymes and it was suggested that higher toxic incidences in mouse small intestine were related to high hydrolytic activity of capecitabine in the small intestine.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shindoh, H., Nakano, K., Yoshida, T., & Ishigai, M. (2011). Comparison of in vitro metabolic conversion of capecitabine to 5-FU in rats, mice, monkeys and humans - toxicological implications. Journal of Toxicological Sciences, 36(4), 411–422. https://doi.org/10.2131/jts.36.411

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free