Penicillinase-producing Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates from different localities in south east Asia: Susceptibility to 15 antibiotics

15Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Sixty four penicillinase-producing Neisseria gonorrhoeae (PPNG) and 24 nonpenicillinase-producing (non-PPNG) strains isolated from six different south east Asian localities were tested by the agar dilution method against 15 antibiotics. All isolates were susceptible to spectinomycin and sulphamethoxazole-trimethoprim (19: 1 ratio). A large proportion of both PPNG and non-PPNG strains showed, however, a decreased susceptibility to tetracycline, kanamycin, and erythromycin: 49% with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of tetracycline ≥,2 μ/ml, 34% with MICs of kanamycin ≤32 μ/ml, and 80% with MICs of erythromycin ≥2 μ/ml. These MIC cut-off values were chosen since they are close to the highest concentrations of these antibiotics attainable in serum after drug administration. Resistance to these antibiotics was not related to penicillinase production and does not appear to be confined to gonococci isolated from one particular locality. Strains showing resistance concurrently to two or three of these drugs were often isolated from different south east Asian countries. All eight cephalosporins tested were effective against both PPNG and non-PPNG strains. On a weight to weight basis the new cephalosporins-namely, moxalactam, cefoperazone, cefotaxime, and ceftriaxone-were the most effective. In contrast to those of cefoxitin, cefuroxime, moxalactam, and cefoperazone the MICs of cefamandole, cefotaxime, and ceftriaxone were significantly affected when the inoculum size was increased from 103 to 106 colony forming units (cfu).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ng, W. S., Chau, P. Y., Ling, J., Echeverria, P., Rockhill, R., & Arnold, K. (1983). Penicillinase-producing Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates from different localities in south east Asia: Susceptibility to 15 antibiotics. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 59(4), 232–236. https://doi.org/10.1136/sti.59.4.232

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free