Synthetic amorphous silica: environmental impacts of current industry and the benefit of biomass-derived silica

28Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The production of Synthetic Amorphous Silica (SAS) is a billion-dollar industry. However, very little is shared publicly on the environmental impact of SAS production. This work provides the first complete treatment for the environmental impacts of SAS produced via the existing ‘dry’ and ‘wet’ industrial methods using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). To provide a more robust method, this includes an evaluation of 8 environmental impact indicators and consideration for uncertainty during process comparison. Predictions are then used to compare the impact of the existing dry and wet methods as well as theoretical methods in which rice husk (RH) is used as a biomass-derived feedstock alternative. Results highlight cases in which using RH as an alternative feedstock is likely to be beneficial. However, it is demonstrated that these benefits are highly dependent on specifics of the process, region, and feedstock characteristics rather than the inherent “green-ness” of RH alone. Findings are therefore of significance to those interested in the existing SAS industry and the sustainable development of SAS. Moreover, findings also have potential implications for wider policy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Errington, E., Guo, M., & Heng, J. Y. Y. (2022). Synthetic amorphous silica: environmental impacts of current industry and the benefit of biomass-derived silica. Green Chemistry, 25(11), 4244–4259. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2gc01433e

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free