Beneficial effects of early attention process training after acquired brain injury: A randomized controlled trial

9Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Evaluation of outcome after intensive cognitive rehabilitation early after brain injury is complicated due to the ongoing biological recovery process. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of Attention Process Training early after acquired brain injury through time-series measurement with statistical process control. Design: Randomized controlled trial. Method: Patients with acquired brain injury (n=59) within 4 months’ post-injury in interdisciplinary rehabilitation received an additional 20 h of attention training with Attention Process Training or with activity-based attention training. The primary outcome variable was Paced Auditory Serial Attention Test (PASAT) evaluated using statistical process control. Results: Both groups improved (p<0.001), although a higher number of patients improved with attention process training (χ2 (1, n=59)=5.93, p=0.015) and the variability was significantly decreased. The Attention Process Training group maintained or improved performance at 6 months follow-up (χ2 (1, n=51)=6,847, p=0.033). Attention Process Training required fewer intervention hours for improvement. Based on individual performance, 3 improvement trajectories were identified: stationary, steady, and rapid improvers. Conclusion: The results indicate that attention training is promising early after acquired brain injury and that Attention Process Training boosts functional improvement. Notably, in the present group of relatively homogeneous patients, 3 different trajectories were identified for recovery after acquired brain injury regardless of intervention.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Markovic, G., Schult, M. L., Elg, M., & Bartfai, A. (2020). Beneficial effects of early attention process training after acquired brain injury: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 52(1). https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2628

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free