Making health continuous: Implications of different methods on the measurement of inequality

15Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In most national surveys, health is measured as a categorical variable. However, in order to be able to calculate socio-economic inequalities in health, a continuous variable is needed. The recently developed interval regression approach was shown to outperform to other approaches like ordered probit. In this research we investigate the impact of using different sets of external data to estimate health inequalities: the EQ-index and the Canadian HUI. We found that the concentration index differs, but the income-related health mobility index and its decomposition are highly similar. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lecluyse, A., & Cleemput, I. (2006). Making health continuous: Implications of different methods on the measurement of inequality. Health Economics, 15(1), 99–104. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1015

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free