A Comparative Study of the Speech Act Advise in Two English Translations of the I Ching

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The present paper reports on a study that compares the strategies of performing Advise as a speech act in two English translations of the I Ching by Richard Wilhelm/ Cary F. Baynes (hereafter, the Wilhelm/Baynes translation) and Alfred Huang (hereafter, the Huang translation) respectively. A dataset consisting of 2,665 sentences was described, compared and analysed after being extracted from the two translations of the I Ching. As a result, the research findings indicate that the number of sentences implementing Advise is very similar between the two translations, yet they have significant differences in terms of several strategies for advice-giving, i.e. Imperative, Impersonal, Hints, Possibility/probability, and Conditional. Accordingly, it is argued that these differences can be traced back to the cultural backgrounds of the two translators and the philosophies they uphold for their own translation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, Z., Li, K., & Mao, Y. (2025). A Comparative Study of the Speech Act Advise in Two English Translations of the I Ching. Contrastive Pragmatics, 6(3), 527–556. https://doi.org/10.1163/26660393-bja10122

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free