Abstract
The present paper reports on a study that compares the strategies of performing Advise as a speech act in two English translations of the I Ching by Richard Wilhelm/ Cary F. Baynes (hereafter, the Wilhelm/Baynes translation) and Alfred Huang (hereafter, the Huang translation) respectively. A dataset consisting of 2,665 sentences was described, compared and analysed after being extracted from the two translations of the I Ching. As a result, the research findings indicate that the number of sentences implementing Advise is very similar between the two translations, yet they have significant differences in terms of several strategies for advice-giving, i.e. Imperative, Impersonal, Hints, Possibility/probability, and Conditional. Accordingly, it is argued that these differences can be traced back to the cultural backgrounds of the two translators and the philosophies they uphold for their own translation.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Wang, Z., Li, K., & Mao, Y. (2025). A Comparative Study of the Speech Act Advise in Two English Translations of the I Ching. Contrastive Pragmatics, 6(3), 527–556. https://doi.org/10.1163/26660393-bja10122
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.