Experimental Methods and Conceptual Confusion

  • Machado A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

According to Grau and Joynes (2005), (1) the current classification of types of learning is based on methodology and assumes a correspondence between types of learning and distinct neural-functional mechanisms; (2) this assumption is wrong because experiments show that different mechanisms may underlie the same type of learning; consequently, (3) we should change the teaching of the psychology of learning. I argue that because Grau and Joynes misunderstood the nature of the classification of learning phenomena and cloaked their research findings with a garb of conceptual errors and infelicities, their recommendations concerning the teaching of learning should be rejected.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Machado, A. (2005). Experimental Methods and Conceptual Confusion. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.46867/ijcp.2005.18.01.07

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free