Rethinking International Legal Standards for the Protection of Migrant Workers: The Case for a “Core Rights” Approach

  • Ruhs M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The UN General Assembly decided in September 2016 that it would start negotiations leading to an international conference and the adoption of a global compact for safe, orderly and regular migration in 2018. The agreement to move toward this comprehensive framework is a momentous one. It means that migration, like other areas of international relations, will be guided by a set of common principles and approaches. Given the well-known and long-standing efforts of various high-income countries to prevent the development of a stronger and more effective global framework for the regulation of international migration, there are obvious reasons to be skeptical that the announced “Global Compact for Migration” will indeed bring about any major change. The ambition to achieve this “Global Compact” has, however, created a window of opportunity to rethink the current approach and debate alternative (or additional) mechanisms for protecting the rights of migrant workers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ruhs, M. (2017). Rethinking International Legal Standards for the Protection of Migrant Workers: The Case for a “Core Rights” Approach. AJIL Unbound, 111, 172–176. https://doi.org/10.1017/aju.2017.35

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free