Pain Assessment after Cesarean Section with a Standardized Pain Questionnaire

  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The importance of postoperative pain management after Cesarean Section (CS) becomes clear in view of the increasing CS rates and the negative long-term consequences of inadequate acute pain therapy. The aim of this study was to describe postoperative pain after CS, to assess patient satisfaction with postoperative pain management and to identify reasons associated with stronger postoperative pain. Methods: Assessment of postoperative pain took place on the first postoperative day after CS using the PAIN OUT Outcome and Process Questionnaire. To cover a wide range of risk factors, information regarding demography, intervention, anesthesia and pain therapy as well as relevant obstetric parameters were recorded. These factors were analyzed for correlation with postoperative pain. Results: Overall maximum pain intensity was high (7.3±1.6) but only short-lasting. Adequate pain management relieved pain by 70% (minimal pain intensity 2.1±1.6) and resulted in a good patient satisfaction in 70%. Severe postoperative pain was significantly associated with greater impairment in activity and uncertainty (p <0.01, r = 0.46). A weak correlation was found between maternal age and intensity of postsurgical pain (Pearson coefficient: 0.29, p=0.021) with women ≥35 years having stronger pain. Intensity of postsurgical pain was rated statistically significant lower by nulliparous women (6.9±1.5) compared with parity ≥1 women (7.7±1.7) (p=0.04). Conclusion: Risk factors for higher pain intensity after CS were maternal age ≥35 years and parity ≥1. Therefore, a sufficient and individual pain management especially in these women is mandatory.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

N, O.-K. (2021). Pain Assessment after Cesarean Section with a Standardized Pain Questionnaire. Austin Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 8(8). https://doi.org/10.26420/austiniobstetgynecol.2021.1195

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free