Radiation Hormesis: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

  • Luckey T
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
155Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Three aspects of hormesis with low doses of ionizing radiation are presented: the good, the bad, and the ugly. The good is acceptance by France, Japan, and China of the thousands of studies showing stimulation and/or benefit, with no harm, from low dose irradiation. This includes thousands of people who live in good health with high background radiation. The bad is the nonacceptance of radiation hormesis by the U. S. and most other governments; their linear no threshold (LNT) concept promulgates fear of all radiation and produces laws which have no basis in mammalian physiology. The LNT concept leads to poor health, unreasonable medicine and oppressed industries. The ugly is decades of deception by medical and radiation committees which refuse to consider valid evidence of radiation hormesis in cancer, other diseases, and health. Specific examples are provided for the good, the bad, and the ugly in radiation hormesis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Luckey, T. D. (2006). Radiation Hormesis: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. Dose-Response, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.2203/dose-response.06-102.luckey

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free