Timing of Impella implantation and outcomes in cardiogenic shock or high-risk percutaneous coronary revascularization

29Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the role of the microaxial percutaneous mechanical circulatory support device (Impella® pump) implantation pre-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus during/after PCI in cardiogenic shock (CS) and high-risk PCI populations. Background: A better understanding of the safety and effectiveness of the Impella and the role of timing of this support initiation in specific clinical settings is of utmost clinical relevance. Methods: A total of 365 patients treated with Impella 2.5/CP in the 17 centers of the IMP-IT Registry were included. Through propensity-score weighting (PSW) analysis, 1-year clinical outcomes were assessed separately in CS and HR-PCI patients, stratified by timing of Impella support. Results: Pre-procedural insertion was associated with an improvement in 1-year survival in patients with CS due to acute myocardial infarction (AMI) treated with PCI (p =.04 before PSW, p =.009 after PSW) and HR-PCI (p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tarantini, G., Masiero, G., Burzotta, F., Pazzanese, V., Briguori, C., Trani, C., … Chieffo, A. (2021). Timing of Impella implantation and outcomes in cardiogenic shock or high-risk percutaneous coronary revascularization. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 98(2), E222–E234. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.29674

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free