CBM-I training and its effect on interpretations of intent, facial expressions, attention and aggressive behavior

4Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

There is abundant evidence suggesting that attention and interpretation biases are powerful precursors of aggression. However, little is known how these biases may interact with one another in the development and maintenance of aggression. Using cognitive bias modification of interpretation (CBM-I), the present study examined whether training more pro-social or hostile intent attributions would affect attention bias, interpretation bias of facial expressions, aggression and mood. University students (17-48 years) were assigned to either a positive training (n = 40), negative training (n = 40), or control training (n = 40). Results showed that the positive training successfully changed measures of intent attributions in a pro-social direction compared to the control training. The negative training changed measures of intent attributions in a hostile direction but not more so than the control training. We found no generalization of the training effects to relevant other outcomes. Possible explanations underlying these findings are discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

AlMoghrabi, N., Franken, I. H. A., Mayer, B., van der Schoot, M., & Huijding, J. (2021). CBM-I training and its effect on interpretations of intent, facial expressions, attention and aggressive behavior. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 17(2), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.2413

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free