Risk factor assessment for breast cancer in North Cyprus: A comprehensive case-control study of Turkish Cypriot women

4Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background/aim: This case-control study aims to assess the strength of associations between reproductive, lifestyle, sociodemographic, and dietary factors as well as other potential breast cancer risks and breast cancer (BC) in a North Cyprus population. Materials and methods: The study includes 408 BC patients and 412 age-matched controls recruited from Near East Hospital and Dr. Burhan Nalbantoglu State Hospital in North Cyprus. Information regarding clinical and epidemiological characteristics was collected through a standardized interview. Age-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by logistic regression before and after adjusting for the potential confounders. Results: In addition to various recognized BC risk factors, strong associations with BC were reported from women with fertility drugs used for >6 cycles (OR = 3.305, 95% CI 1.850–5.906, P < 0.001), depression (OR = 2.10, 95% CI 1.33–3.30, P < 0.001), exposure to radiation (OR = 1.74, 95% CI 1.02–2.98, P = 0.041), and excess consumption of oil (OR = 2.703, 95% CI 1.62–4.48, P < 0.001) and sugar (OR = 3.42, 95% CI 1.39–8.40, P = 0.007). Parental consanguinity (OR = 0.16, 96% CI 0.09–0.30, P < 0.001) and daily water intake of 1–2 L (OR = 0.36, 95% CI 0.19–0.66, P < 0.001) were strong protective factors. Conclusion: Our results demonstrate the presence of classical as well as several additional BC risks. The findings will be of great benefit in establishing adequate evidence-based awareness and preventative measures in the North Cyprus population.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pervaiz, R., Tosun, Ö., Besim, H., & Serakinci, N. (2018). Risk factor assessment for breast cancer in North Cyprus: A comprehensive case-control study of Turkish Cypriot women. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 48(2), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.3906/sag-1709-54

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free