Toward a common interpretation of the 3Rs principles in animal research

27Citations
Citations of this article
78Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Many scientific breakthroughs have depended on animal research, yet the ethical concerns surrounding the use of animals in experimentation have long prompted discussions about humane treatment and responsible scientific practice. First articulated by Russell and Burch, the 3Rs Principles of Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement have gained widespread recognition as basic guidelines for animal research. Over time, the 3Rs have transcended the research community, influencing policy decisions, animal welfare advocacy and public perception of animal experimentation. Despite their broad acceptance, interpretations of the 3Rs vary substantially, shaping statutory frameworks at various levels, with both technical and practical impacts.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lauwereyns, J., Bajramovic, J., Bert, B., Camenzind, S., De Kock, J., Elezović, A., … Ahluwalia, A. (2024, December 1). Toward a common interpretation of the 3Rs principles in animal research. Lab Animal. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41684-024-01476-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free