Insulin delivery route for the artificial pancreas: Subcutaneous, intraperitoneal, or intravenous? Pros and cons

52Citations
Citations of this article
54Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Insulin delivery is a crucial component of a closed-loop system aiming at the development of an artificial pancreas. The intravenous route, which has been used in the bedside artificial pancreas model for 30 years, has clear advantages in terms of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, but cannot be used in any ambulatory system so far. Subcutaneous (SC) insulin infusion benefts from the broad expansion of insulin pump therapy that promoted the availability of constantly improving technology and fast-acting insulin analog use. However, persistent delays of insulin absorption and action, variability and shortterm stability of insulin infusion from SC-inserted catheters generate effectiveness and safety issues in view of an ambulatory, automated, glucosecontrolled, artificial beta cell. Intraperitoneal insulin delivery, although still marginally used in diabetes care, may offer an interesting alternative because of its more-physiological plasma insulin profiles and sustained stability and reliability of insulin delivery.© Diabetes Technology Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Renard, E. (2008). Insulin delivery route for the artificial pancreas: Subcutaneous, intraperitoneal, or intravenous? Pros and cons. In Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology (Vol. 2, pp. 735–738). SAGE Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.1177/193229680800200429

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free