Multimodality imaging in preoperative assessment of left atrial appendage transcatheter occlusion with the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug

Abstract

Aims Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) with the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug (ACP) emerged as a valid alternative in patients with a formal contraindication to oral anticoagulant therapy. Transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE), cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA), intracardiac echocardiography (ICE), and conventional cardiac angiography (CCA) are used to evaluate LAA diameters. The aim of our study was to compare pre-and intraprocedural imaging techniques in determining the correct selection of the device size, with a retrospective evaluation of the results obtained at post-procedural CCTA follow-up. Methods and results Between September 2009 and July 2013, 66 consecutive patients underwent to LAAO with the ACP at our institution. Preoperative LAA evaluation was realized with TEE, CCTA, ICE, and CCA. Fifty-eight (58) patients underwent to postproceduralCCTAto confirm the LAAcomplete exclusion, the number and extent of the residual leaks, and the positioning of the device. LAA diameters measured by CCTA correlate with the diameters obtained with CCAand ICE, but they are sized slightly larger than the others. TEE has a lower correlation with every other imaging method and a likely tendency to underestimate. The distribution of the leaks and the positioning of the device in post-procedural CCTA show no substantial differences between the devices used greater or equal to the one selected with CCTAin terms of LAA exclusion. Conclusion The sizing of the device decided using CCTA in the phase of maximum LAA expansion reduces the risk of high-flow leaks and device malposition due to undersizing.