Middle cerebral artery occlusion in Wistar and Fischer-344 rats: Functional and morphological assessment of the model

37Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Cerebral infarction volume after occlusion of a short proximal segment of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) is reported to be different in Wistar compared to Fischer-344 (F344) rats, in both size and variability. Knowledge about the cause of these differences might enable us to explain and perhaps reduce the variation in infarct volume and create a reproducible model of focal cerebral ischemia in the rat. We investigated in Wistar and F344 rats both the effect of occlusion of a long proximal MCA segment on cerebral infarction volume, visualized by magnetic resonance imaging and histology, and the morphology of the major cerebral arteries. Occlusion of a long proximal MCA segment resulted in a striatal and a small cortical infarction in Wistar and a striatal and sizable cortical infarction in F344 rats (as is the case after occlusion of a short proximal MCA segment). In Wistar rats, however, occlusion of a long proximal MCA segment strongly reduced the variability in infarction volume in comparison to occlusion of a small proximal MCA segment. Analysis of the morphology of the major cerebral arteries showed a significantly higher number of proximal side branches of the long proximal MCA segment in Wistar rats than in F344 rats. We conclude that after short-segment proximal MCA occlusion, extreme variability in cerebral infarction volume in Wistar rats compared to F344 rats may be attributable to a significantly greater number of proximal MCA side branches in Wistar rats than F344 rats.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Herz, R. C. G., Jonker, M., Verheul, H. B., Hillen, B., Versteeg, D. H. G., & De Wildt, D. J. (1996). Middle cerebral artery occlusion in Wistar and Fischer-344 rats: Functional and morphological assessment of the model. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, 16(2), 296–302. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004647-199603000-00015

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free